Nissan Murano 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Murano is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Murano is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Murano also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 256 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 - 450 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, Nissan Murano are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 10.9 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Nissan Murano equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 31 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`326 kg | ~ 2`105 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`843 kg | ~ 1`561 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 483 kg | ~ 544 kg | |
| Nissan Murano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |