Nissan Murano 2010 vs Nissan Murano 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.5 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 255 HP | 190 - 256 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 - 450 NM | 334 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 8 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 10.6 | 8.0 - 10.9 | |
|
Nissan Murano 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Murano 2008. On average, a Nissan Murano 2010 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan Murano 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Murano 2010 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Murano 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Murano 2010 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 402 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`438 | ~ 2`326 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |