Nissan Moco 2006 vs Suzuki Wagon R+ 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.7 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Moco) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Wagon R+) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 63 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Moco engine produces 6 HP less power than Suzuki Wagon R+, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Suzuki Wagon R+. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 30 litres | 41 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.40 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.48 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Moco is smaller. Nissan Moco is 15 cm shorter than the Suzuki Wagon R+, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Moco is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 248 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 595 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 820 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
| |