Nissan Moco 2002 vs Suzuki Wagon R+ 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.7 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 53 HP | |
| Torque: | 83 NM | 76 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Moco engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Wagon R+, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Suzuki Wagon R+. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 30 litres | 41 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.40 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan Moco is smaller. Nissan Moco is 11 cm shorter than the Suzuki Wagon R+, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Moco is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 595 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Moco is 1.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Wagon R+, which means Nissan Moco can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`120 | 1`415 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Moco has
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
| |