Nissan Moco 2002 vs Opel Agila 2000

 
Nissan Moco
2002 - 2006
Opel Agila
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 0.7 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 54 HP58 HP
Torque: 63 NM85 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds18 seconds
Nissan Moco engine produces 4 HP less power than Opel Agila, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Opel Agila.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.3
Fuel tank capacity: 30 litres41 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years3 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Opel Corsa
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Opel Agila engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 3.40 m3.50 m
Width: 1.48 m1.62 m
Height: 1.60 m1.70 m
Nissan Moco is smaller.
Nissan Moco is 11 cm shorter than the Opel Agila, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Moco is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data595 litres
Turning diameter: 8.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Moco is 1.4 metres less than that of the Opel Agila, which means Nissan Moco can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`325
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1400
Pros and Cons: Nissan Moco has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Agila has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv