Nissan Moco 2006 vs Suzuki Wagon R+ 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Moco is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Wagon R+ can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan Moco is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 60 HP | 60 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 63 - 83 NM | 88 - 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.2 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 - 6.0 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.40 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.48 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Moco is smaller. Nissan Moco is 15 cm shorter than the Suzuki Wagon R+, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Moco is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 248 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 595 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 860 | ~ 955 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Moco has
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
| |