Nissan Micra 2006 vs Audi TT 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra engine produces 70 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Audi TT. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 56 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Micra 2006 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Micra is 23 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Micra has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. The Audi TT may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Audi TT has
| |