Nissan Micra 2000 vs Ford Fiesta 2003

 
Nissan Micra
2000 - 2003
Ford Fiesta
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 57 HP68 HP
Torque: 95 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.7 seconds14.9 seconds
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Micra engine produces 11 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.1 l/100km5.1 l/100km
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle1040 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway1210 km on highway
820 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.75 m3.92 m
Width: 1.60 m1.68 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
Nissan Micra is smaller.
Nissan Micra is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data268 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data945 litres
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`560
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • lower price
Ford Fiesta has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv