Nissan Micra 2000 vs Suzuki Ignis 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Ignis is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 23 HP less power than Suzuki Ignis, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Suzuki Ignis. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Ignis, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Ignis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Ignis might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.54 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 13 cm longer than the Suzuki Ignis, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 620 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Micra has 75 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Ignis. This could mean that the Nissan Micra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Suzuki Ignis, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Suzuki Ignis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Suzuki Ignis, so Suzuki Ignis quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Ignis has
| |