Nissan Micra 2000 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 4 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 20 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 60 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.4 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Micra, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |