Nissan Micra 2003 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Micra) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Jazz) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 18 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 41 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1323 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 9 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 739 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |