Nissan Micra 2003 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Despite the higher power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.7 | |
| Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Cube | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |