Nissan Micra 2005 vs Citroen C2 2003

 
Nissan Micra
2005 - 2008
Citroen C2
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 82 HP68 HP
Torque: 185 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds13.5 seconds
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive.
Nissan Micra engine produces 14 HP more power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Citroen C2. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.1
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Micra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 46 litres41 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1130 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.67 m
Width: 1.66 m1.66 m
Height: 1.54 m1.46 m
Nissan Micra is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C2, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres166 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
584 litres879 litres
Nissan Micra has 85 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 295 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C2.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5101`390
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Nissan Micra has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C2, so Nissan Micra quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 20001200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Citroen C2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv