Nissan Micra 2005 vs Citroen C3 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra engine produces 13 HP more power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Citroen C3. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 13 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 54 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 566 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Citroen C3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen C3, so Citroen C3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |