Nissan Micra 2005 vs Citroen C2 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra engine produces 13 HP more power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Citroen C2. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C2, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 879 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 58 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |