Nissan Micra 2003 vs Audi A2 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Audi A2 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Audi A2. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 11 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
584 litres | 1085 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 19 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 501 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A2, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`510 kg | 1`525 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 1`095 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 430 kg | |
| Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Audi A2. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Audi A2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A2, so Audi A2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Audi A2 has
| |