Nissan Micra 2003 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 110 NM | 115 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Toyota Starlet is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota Starlet, but torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Starlet. Despite the higher power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.8 | |
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 3.74 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.40 m | |
Nissan Micra is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Starlet, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Micra is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 900 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Starlet has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |