Nissan Micra 2011 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 19 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Note | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 72 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |