Nissan Micra 2013 vs Nissan Note 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 142 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra engine produces 18 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Nissan Note. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Note | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.78 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 32 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 325 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1495 litres | |
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 60 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`510 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6800 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Note has
| |