Nissan Micra 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 10 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Note | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 6 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 265 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |