Nissan Micra 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 14 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 512 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Micra has 54 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |