Nissan Micra 2013 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra and Mitsubishi Space Star have the same engine power, but Nissan Micra torque is 4 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Note | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Micra has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |