Nissan Micra 2017 vs Toyota Auris 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota Auris, but torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 28 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1004 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 60 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |