Nissan Micra 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 79 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.7 seconds | 19.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra 1996 engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Micra 1998, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1996 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
| |