Nissan Micra 1992 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 45 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 76 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.7 seconds | 22.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra engine produces 9 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.0 | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 11 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 580 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 64 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Nissan Micra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |