Nissan Micra 1992 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 66 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 99 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.7 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 12 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Getz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Getz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Picanto, Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai Getz, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 48 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 520 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |