Nissan Micra 1992 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 16 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.4 | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 62 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |