Nissan Micra 1992 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 11 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 580 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 64 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Nissan Micra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |