Nissan Micra 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 103 NM | 103 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Nissan Micra 1996 and Nissan Micra 1998 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Micra 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.5 | |
Nissan Micra 1996 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 1998, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.70 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.58 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1996 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |