Nissan Micra 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 HP | 55 HP | |
Torque: | 79 NM | 79 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
Nissan Micra 1996 and Nissan Micra 1998 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
By specification Nissan Micra 1996 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 1998, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra 1996 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 1998. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.70 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.58 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1996 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`290 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
| |