Nissan Micra 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998

 
Nissan Micra
1996 - 1998
Nissan Micra
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 55 HP55 HP
Torque: 79 NM79 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds16.4 seconds
Nissan Micra 1996 and Nissan Micra 1998 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.6 l/100km
By specification Nissan Micra 1996 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 1998, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra 1996 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 1998.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway790 km on highway
640 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 3.70 m3.72 m
Width: 1.58 m1.58 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1996 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra 1996 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 206 litres206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
960 litres960 litres
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters9.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`2901`290
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 6001000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv