Nissan Micra 1996 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 95 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Alfa Romeo 145. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 39 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 114 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.3 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 145, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |