Nissan Micra 1998 vs Peugeot 206 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 32 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.6 | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`390 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |