Nissan Micra 1998 vs Nissan Micra 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra 1998 engine produces 7 HP less power than Nissan Micra 2000, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Micra 2000. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
| Nissan Micra 1998 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra 1998 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1998 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 2000, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Nissan Micra 1998 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra 2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |