Nissan Micra 1998 vs Peugeot 206 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra and Peugeot 206 have the same engine power, but Nissan Micra torque is 17 NM less than Peugeot 206. Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 39 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |