Nissan Micra 1998 vs Nissan Micra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra 1998 engine produces 7 HP less power than Nissan Micra 2000, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Micra 2000. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra 1998 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra 1998 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1998 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 2000, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Nissan Micra 1998 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra 2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |