Nissan Micra 1998 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 74 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.7 seconds | 19.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra engine produces 5 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Peugeot 106. Despite the higher power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 106 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.38 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 953 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Micra has 9 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 106. This could mean that the Nissan Micra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 7 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`215 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |