Nissan Micra 1998 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 74 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 19.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra engine produces 5 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Peugeot 106. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.38 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
960 litres | 953 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`215 kg | |
| Net weight: | 775 kg | 795 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 420 kg | |
| Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Peugeot 106. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
| |