Nissan Micra 2017 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Nissan Micra torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger. Nissan Micra is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1004 litres | 952 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Polo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |