Nissan Micra 2017 vs Audi A1 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Audi A1 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra and Audi A1 have the same engine power, but Nissan Micra torque is 10 NM less than Audi A1. Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra is 3 cm longer than the Audi A1, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1004 litres | 920 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi A1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 84 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi A1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi A1, so Audi A1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Audi A1 has
| |