Nissan Micra 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra engine produces 13 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1004 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 146 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |