Nissan Micra 2017 vs Honda Jazz 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 29 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Micra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Dacia Sandero | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger, but lower. Nissan Micra and Honda Jazz are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1004 litres | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 310 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |