Nissan Micra 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018

 
Nissan Micra
2017 - 2019
Skoda Fabia
2018 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 0.9 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP75 HP
Torque: 140 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds14.9 seconds
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive.
Nissan Micra engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km5.9 l/100km
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 41 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway1070 km on highway
660 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.00 m
Width: 1.74 m1.73 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1004 litres1150 litres
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space.
Nissan Micra has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 146 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight: 1`530 kg1`541 kg
Net weight:1`063 kg1`011 kg
Load capacity:467 kg530 kg
Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 0007800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Skoda Fabia has
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv