Nissan Micra 2017 vs Toyota Yaris 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, but torque is 4 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Smart ForFour | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger, but lower. Nissan Micra is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 347 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1004 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Micra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`490 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`063 kg | 1`055 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 467 kg | 435 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Yaris scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Yaris scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |