Nissan Micra 2017 vs Honda Jazz 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 17 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Smart ForFour | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger, but lower. Nissan Micra and Honda Jazz are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1004 litres | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 310 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`605 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`063 kg | 1`164 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 467 kg | 441 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |