Nissan Micra 2017 vs Citroen C3 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra and Citroen C3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1004 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`610 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`063 kg | 1`090 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 467 kg | 520 kg | |
| Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Citroen C3. Therefore, Citroen C3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |