Nissan Micra 2017 vs BMW i3 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
BMW i3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 80 HP less power than BMW i3, whereas torque is 110 NM less than BMW i3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.4 l/100km | ||
| Range per fill-up: | 930 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Micra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW i3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.58 m | |
| Nissan Micra and BMW i3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1004 litres | 1100 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 40 litres more trunk space than the BMW i3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW i3 (by 96 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW i3, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`620 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`063 kg | 1`195 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 467 kg | 425 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
BMW i3 has
| |