Nissan Micra 1992 vs Seat Ibiza 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 45 - 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 76 - 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 8.9 - 22.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 6.0 - 8.6 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 11 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 802 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 64 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`295 | ~ 1`433 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |