Nissan Micra 1992 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 66 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 99 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 9.6 - 15.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 4.5 - 7.0 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Getz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai Getz, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 48 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`295 | ~ 1`494 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |