Nissan Micra 1996 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 860 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 76 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`295 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |