Nissan Micra 1996 vs Skoda Felicia 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Micra is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Skoda Felicia is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 54 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 94 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 12 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 6.4 - 7.1 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Felicia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 16 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`295 | ~ 892 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |